Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The F1 score on the CULane dataset is not as high as reported in the paper. #71

Open
YiShiyi11 opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@YiShiyi11
Copy link

When using ResNet18 as the backbone, the F1 score is only 77.9. Likewise, when using ResNet101 as the backbone, the F1 score is only 78.7.
We have trained multiple times, but the results have consistently been the same. Why is this happening?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant