You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First off, thanks for the well-formatted issue. I understand the frustration around NaNs; R handles them implicitly (albeit in an almost black-box fashion) while most python libraries make you, the programmer, address them first.
The reason for the error is due to the call to scikit-learn's check_array which does not tolerate NaNs. Best strategy for now is to impute them yourself, and if scikit makes the move towards handling NaNs it might make sense for us to as well.
Description
When the dataset contains "nans", it seems to fail. When using auto.arima in R, these are handled/omitted
Steps/Code to Reproduce
Expected Results
Ommit nans
Actual Results
Raises an "ValueError"
Versions
Windows-7-6.1.7601-SP1
Python 3.6.7 |Anaconda custom (64-bit)| (default, Oct 28 2018, 19:44:12) [MSC v.1915 64 bit (AMD64)]
pmdarima 1.0.0
NumPy 1.15.4
SciPy 1.1.0
Scikit-Learn 0.20.0
Statsmodels 0.9.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: