forked from betterspecs/betterspecs
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
zh_tw.html
1334 lines (1007 loc) · 55.5 KB
/
zh_tw.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
---
title: 'Better Specs (中文台灣)'
---
<% content_for :menu do %>
<li><a href="/">rspec 入門指南</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#describe">如何描述 (describe) 你的 methods</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#contexts">使用 context</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#short">保持簡潔的 description</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#single">測試單一條件</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#all">驗證所有可能的情況</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#subject">善用 subject</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#let">善用 let 和 let!</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#mock">Mock 的時機</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#data">只建立必要的資料</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#factories">取 factory 捨 fixture</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#matchers">一目瞭然的 matcher</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#sharedexamples">通用測項</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#integration">測你所見</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#should">Description 不提 should</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#guard">用 guard 自動化測試</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#spork">用 spork 縮短測試時間</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#http">偽裝 HTTP request</a></li>
<li class="little">» <a href="#formatter">好用的 formatter</a></li>
<li><a href="#books">Books</a></li>
<li><a href="#presentations">Presentations</a></li>
<li><a href="#resources">Resources on the web</a></li>
<li><a href="#screencasts">Screencasts</a></li>
<li><a href="#libraries">Libraries</a></li>
<li><a href="#styleguide">Styleguide</a></li>
<li><a href="#improving">Improving Better Specs</a></li>
<li><a href="#credits">Credits</a></li>
<li><a href="#help">Help us</a></li>
<% end %>
<div class="content">
<article>
<aside class="menu">
<h1>Affiliate books</h1>
<%= render "partials/books" %>
</aside>
</article>
<article>
<iframe src="http://ghbtns.com/github-btn.html?user=andreareginato&repo=betterspecs&type=watch&count=true&size=large"
allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" scrolling="0" width="170px" height="30px"></iframe>
<iframe src="http://ghbtns.com/github-btn.html?user=andreareginato&repo=betterspecs&type=fork&count=true&size=large"
allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" scrolling="0" width="170px" height="30px"></iframe>
<iframe src="http://ghbtns.com/github-btn.html?user=andreareginato&repo=betterspecs&type=follow&count=true&size=large"
allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" scrolling="0" width="300px" height="30px"></iframe>
</article>
</br>
<article>
<!-- <p>
<a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/">RSpec</a> is a great tool in the behavior-driven development (BDD) process of writing human readable specifications that direct and validate
the development of your application.
</p> -->
<p>
<a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/">RSpec</a> 是一個好工具。它在 BDD 開發流程中被用來撰寫可讀性高的規格(測項)，引導並驗證你所開發的應用程式。
</p>
<!-- <p>
On the web there are many resources that give complete overview of _what_ you can do with RSpec.
But there are fewer resources devoted to how to create a great RSpec test suite.
<p> -->
<p>
網路上多半的資源告訴你 RSpec 能「做些什麼」，但很少討論如何使用它「做出好的規格(測項)」。
</p>
<!-- <p>
Better Specs tries to fill this gap by collecting most of the "best practices" that other
developers learn through years of experience.
</p> -->
<p>
Better Specs 盡可能地收集開發者們經年累月習得的 "Best practice" 來幫助你達到這個目標。
</p>
</article>
<article>
<!-- <h1><a name="describe">How to describe your methods</a></h1> -->
<h1><a name="describe">如何描述 (describe) 你的 methods</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
Be clear about what method you are describing. For instance, use the Ruby documentation convention of
<code>.</code> (or <code>::</code>) when referring to a class method's name and <code>#</code> when
referring to an instance method's name.
</p> -->
<p>
清楚地描述你的 method。譬如在提到 class method 時加上 Ruby 文件慣用的 <code>.</code> (或 <code>::</code>)，在提到 instance method 時加上 <code>#</code>。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">describe 'the authenticate method for User' do
describe 'if the user is an admin' do
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">describe '.authenticate' do
describe '#admin?' do
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/2">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | how to describe your methods" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#describe" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#describe" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<!-- <h1><a name="contexts">Use contexts</a></h1> -->
<h1><a name="contexts">使用 context</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
Contexts are a powerful method to make your tests clear and well organized.
In the long term this practice will keep tests easy to read.
</p> -->
<p>
Context 讓你的測項更明確、有條理，在漫長的開發過程中保持可讀性。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">it 'has 200 status code if logged in' do
response.should respond_with 200
end
it 'has 401 status code if not logged in' do
response.should respond_with 401
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">context 'when logged in' do
it { is_expected.to respond_with 200 }
end
context 'when logged out' do
it { is_expected.to respond_with 401 }
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
When describing a context, start its description with "when" or "with".
<p> -->
<p>
描述 context 時，要用 "when" 或 "with" 做開頭。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/3">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | use contexts" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#contexts" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#contexts" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<!-- <h1><a name="short">Keep your description short</a></h1> -->
<h1><a name="short">保持簡潔的 description</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
A spec description should never be longer than 40 characters. If this happens
you should split it using a context.
</p> -->
<p>
控制 spec 的描述字數在 40 字以內，超過的話應該用 context 分段。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">it 'has 422 status code if an unexpected params will be added' do
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">context 'when not valid' do
it { should respond_with 422 }
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
In the example we removed the description related to the status code,
which has been replaced by the expectation <code>it { should respond_with 422 }</code>.
If you run this test typing <code>rspec filename</code> you will obtain a readable output.
</p> -->
<p>
上例中我們把 status code 相關的描述用測項本體 <code>it { should respond_with 422 }</code> 取代。
如果你用 <code>rspec filename</code> 執行這個測項，仍然會輸出具可讀性的報告。
</p>
<p class="base">Formatted Output</p>
<div>
<pre><code>when not valid
it should respond with 422
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/4">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | keep your description short" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#short" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#contexts" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<!-- <h1><a name="single">Single expectation test</a></h1> -->
<h1><a name="single">測試單一條件</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
The 'one expectation' tip is more broadly expressed as 'each test should make only one assertion'.
This helps you on finding possible errors, going directly to the failing test, and to make your
code readable.
</p> -->
<p>
「單一條件」意指一個測項應該只帶有一個檢查 (expection, assertion)。這樣做能幫助你直接前往失敗的測項尋找可能的問題，也讓程式碼比較好看。
</p>
<!-- <p>
In isolated unit specs, you want each example to specify one (and only one) behavior. Multiple
expectations in the same example are a signal that you may be specifying multiple behaviors.
</p> -->
<p>
獨立的規格單元測項中，每一題應該只定義「一個行為」。用上多個檢查表示你可能在一題裡定義了多個行為。
</p>
<!-- <p>
Anyway, in tests that are not isolated (e.g. ones that integrate with a DB, an external webservice,
or end-to-end-tests), you take a massive performance hit to do the same setup over and over
again, just to set a different expectation in each test. In these sorts of slower tests, I
think it's fine to specify more than one isolated behavior.
</p> -->
<p>
但在涉及 DB 、外部 webservice、或是整合測試這類非獨立的測項裡，不斷做重覆的前置設定 (setup) 會拖慢測試效率，倒不如在一個測項放上多個檢查。我認為這種跑不快的測項可以一題檢查一個以上的行為。
</p>
<p class="correct">good (isolated)</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">it { should respond_with_content_type(:json) }
it { should assign_to(:resource) }
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>
<p class="correct">Good (not isolated)</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">it 'creates a resource' do
response.should respond_with_content_type(:json)
response.should assign_to(:resource)
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/5">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | single expectation test" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#single" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#single" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="all">驗證所有可能的情況</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
Testing is a good practice, but if you do not test the edge cases, it will not
be useful. Test valid, edge and invalid case. For example, consider the following action.
</p> -->
<p>
實行測試很好，但是如果測項沒有包括 edge case 的話，它並不能發揮最大的效用。有效的、無效的、和 edge case 都需要被驗證，可以參考下述範例的作法。
</p>
<p class="base">Destroy action</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">before_filter :find_owned_resources
before_filter :find_resource
def destroy
render 'show'
@consumption.destroy
end</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
The error I usually see lies in testing only whether the resource has been removed.
But there are at least two edge cases: when the resource is not found and when it's not
owned. As a rule of thumb think of all the possible inputs and test them.
</p> -->
<p>
我常在只針對是否成功移除 resource 的測項裡看到失誤。這類行為至少還包括兩個 edge case：要移除的 resource 不存在，以及無權限移除。切記，考慮所有可能的輸入值並對它們進行測試。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">it 'shows the resource'
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<div class="correct">
<pre><code class="ruby">describe '#destroy' do
context 'when resource is found' do
it 'responds with 200'
it 'shows the resource'
end
context 'when resource is not found' do
it 'responds with 404'
end
context 'when resource is not owned' do
it 'responds with 404'
end
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/6">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | test all possible cases" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#all" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#all" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="subject">善用 subject</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
If you have several tests related to the same subject use
<code>subject{}</code> to DRY them up.
</p> -->
<p>
當多個測項針對的 subject 相同時，善用 <code>subject{}</code> 取代重覆的程式碼 (DRY)。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">it { assigns('message').should match /it was born in Belville/ }
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">subject { assigns('message') }
it { should match /it was born in Billville/ }
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
RSpec has also the ability to use a named subject.
</p> -->
<p>
RSpec 同時提供命名 subject 的功能。
</p>
<p class="correct">Good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">subject(:hero) { Hero.first }
it "carries a sword" do
hero.equipment.should include "sword"
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
Learn more about <a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-11/docs/subject">rspec subject</a>.
</p> -->
<p>
請看更多關於 <a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-11/docs/subject">rspec subject</a> 的資訊。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/7">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | use subject" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#subject" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#subject" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="let">善用 let 和 let!</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
When you have to assign a variable instead of using a <code>before</code> block to create
an instance variable, use <code>let</code>. Using <code>let</code> the variable lazy loads
only when it is used the first time in the test and get cached until that specific test is
finished. A really good and deep description of what <code>let</code> can be found in this
<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5359558/when-to-use-rspec-let/5359979#5359979">stackoverflow answer</a>.
</p> -->
<p>
當你需要指定 variable 時，用 <code>let</code> 代替 <code>before</code> 來建立 instance variable。
<code>let</code> 有 lazy load 特性，只在測項第一次用到該 variable 時被執行，並且會 cache 直到該測項結束。
想更深入瞭解 <code>let</code> 請參考這個 <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5359558/when-to-use-rspec-let/5359979#5359979">stackoverflow answer</a>。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">describe '#type_id' do
before { @resource = FactoryGirl.create :device }
before { @type = Type.find @resource.type_id }
it 'sets the type_id field' do
@resource.type_id.should equal(@type.id)
end
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">describe '#type_id' do
let(:resource) { FactoryGirl.create :device }
let(:type) { Type.find resource.type_id }
it 'sets the type_id field' do
resource.type_id.should equal(type.id)
end
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
Use <code>let</code> to initialize actions that are lazy loaded to test your specs.
</p> -->
<p>
用 <code>let</code> 進行的初始化會在測項執行時以 lazy load 方式完成。
</p>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">context 'when updates a not existing property value' do
let(:properties) { { id: Settings.resource_id, value: 'on'} }
def update
resource.properties = properties
end
it 'raises a not found error' do
expect { update }.to raise_error Mongoid::Errors::DocumentNotFound
end
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
Use <code>let!</code> if you want to define the variable when the block is defined.
This can be useful to populate your database to test queries or scopes.
</p> -->
<p>
如果想要 variable 在定義時就被建立，請用 <code>let!</code>。這個技巧在產生 database 內容以測試 query 和 scope 時十分好用。
</p>
<!-- <p>
Here an example of what let actually is.
</p> -->
<p>
以下是一個 <code>let</code> 的實例。
</p>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby"># this:
let(:foo) { Foo.new }
# is very nearly equivalent to this:
def foo
@foo ||= Foo.new
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
Learn more about <a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-11/docs/helper-methods/let-and-let">rspec let</a>.
</p> -->
<p>
請看更多關於 <a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-11/docs/helper-methods/let-and-let">rspec let</a> 的資訊。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/8">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | use let and let!" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#let" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#let" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="mock">Mock 的時機</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
There's a debate going on. Do not (over)use mocks and test real behavior when possible.
Testing real cases are useful when updating your application flow.
</p> -->
<p>
關於 mock 的用法仍有爭議。能對真實行為測試的時候，不要(過度)依賴 mock。真實的測項在你改善應用程式流程時十分有幫助。
</p>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby"># simulate a not found resource
context "when not found" do
before { allow(Resource).to receive(:where).with(created_from: params[:id]).and_return(false) }
it { should respond_with 404 }
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
Mocking makes your specs faster but they are difficult to use. You need to understand them
well to use them well. Read more <a href="http://myronmars.to/n/dev-blog/2012/06/thoughts-on-mocking">about</a>.
</p> -->
<p>
Mock 能改善測項的執行速度，但它並不容易上手。你必須對 mock 更熟悉才能讓它正確地派上用場，請看<a href="http://myronmars.to/n/dev-blog/2012/06/thoughts-on-mocking">更多的說明</a>。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/9">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | mock or not to mock" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#mock" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#mock" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="data">只建立必要的資料</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
If you have ever worked in a medium size project (but also in small ones), test suites
can be heavy to run. To solve this problem, it's important not to load more data than needed.
Also, if you think you need dozens of records, you are probably wrong.
</p> -->
<p>
如果你有參與過中型的專案 (有些小專案也如此)，跑測試可能是件快不起來的工作。為了解決這個問題，千萬不要載入非必要的資料。如果你發現你需要上打的 record，你可能用錯方法了。
</p>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">describe "User"
describe ".top" do
before { FactoryGirl.create_list(:user, 3) }
it { User.top(2).should have(2).item }
end
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/10">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | create only tha data you need" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#data" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#data" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="factories">取 factory 捨 fixture</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
This is an old topic, but it's still good to remember it. Do not use fixtures because
they are difficult to control, use factories instead. Use them to reduce the verbosity
on creating new data.
</p> -->
<p>
這是個值得重彈的老調。不要用 fixture，它太難維護了。改用 fatory，它能減輕建立新資料負擔。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">user = User.create(
name: 'Genoveffa',
surname: 'Piccolina',
city: 'Billyville',
birth: '17 Agoust 1982',
active: true
)
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">user = FactoryGirl.create :user
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
One important note. When talking about unit tests the best practice would be to use neither
fixtures or factories. Put as much of your domain logic in libraries that can be tested without
needing complex, time consuming setup with either factories or fixtures. Read more in
<a href="http://blog.steveklabnik.com/posts/2012-07-14-why-i-don-t-like-factory_girl">this article</a> -->
<p>
另外請看<a href="http://blog.steveklabnik.com/posts/2012-07-14-why-i-don-t-like-factory_girl">這篇文章</a>。當討論到 unit test 的時候，最佳情況是不用 fixture 也不用 factory。盡可能把你的 domain logic 留在那些不用靠 factory 和 fixture 進行複雜耗時前置設定的函式庫裡。
</p>
<!-- <p>
Learn more about <a href="https://github.com/thoughtbot/factory_girl">Factory Girl</a>.
</p> -->
<p>
請看更多關於 <a href="https://github.com/thoughtbot/factory_girl">Factory Girl</a> 的資訊。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/11">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | use factories and not fixtures" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#factories" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#factories" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="matchers">一目瞭然的 matcher</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
Use readable matchers and double check the available <a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/docs/built-in-matchers">rspec matchers</a>.
</p> -->
<p>
善用 <a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/docs/built-in-matchers">rspec 內建</a> 或意義簡明的 matcher 。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">lambda { model.save! }.should raise_error Mongoid::Errors::DocumentNotFound
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">expect { model.save! }.to raise_error Mongoid::Errors::DocumentNotFound
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/12">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | easy to read matcher #betterspecs" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#matchers" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#matchers" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="sharedexamples">通用測項</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
Making tests is great and you get more confident day after day. But in the end you will start to see code duplication coming up everywhere.
Use shared examples to DRY your test suite up.
</p> -->
<p>
撰寫測項是個好習慣，能增加你開發過程中的信心。但漸漸你會發現裡頭出現越來越多重覆的程式碼，你需要通用測項讓你的測試更 DRY。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">describe 'GET /devices' do
let!(:resource) { FactoryGirl.create :device, created_from: user.id }
let(:uri) { '/devices' }
context 'when shows all resources' do
let!(:not_owned) { FactoryGirl.create factory }
it 'shows all owned resources' do
page.driver.get uri
page.status_code.should be(200)
contains_owned_resource resource
does_not_contain_resource not_owned
end
end
describe '?start=:uri' do
it 'shows the next page' do
page.driver.get uri, start: resource.uri
page.status_code.should be(200)
contains_resource resources.first
page.should_not have_content resource.id.to_s
end
end
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">describe 'GET /devices' do
let!(:resource) { FactoryGirl.create :device, created_from: user.id }
let(:uri) { '/devices' }
it_behaves_like 'a listable resource'
it_behaves_like 'a paginable resource'
it_behaves_like 'a searchable resource'
it_behaves_like 'a filterable list'
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<p>
經驗上來看，通用測項主要用在 controller 上。因為不同 model 間差異較大，少有通用的邏輯。
</p>
<p>
請看更多關於 <a href="https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-11/docs/example-groups/shared-examples">rspec shared examples</a> 的資訊。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/13">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | shared examples" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#sharedexamples" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#sharedexamples" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="integration">測你所見</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
<strong>Deeply test your models and your application behaviour (integration tests).
Do not add useless complexity testing controllers.</strong>
</p> -->
<p>
<strong>
詳盡地檢驗 model 和應用程式的整合行為，不要浪費複雜卻無用的測試在 controller 上。
</strong>
</p>
<!-- <p>
When I first started testing my apps I was testing controllers, now I don't.
Now I only create integration tests using RSpec and Capybara. Why? Because I truly
believe that you should test what you see and because testing controllers is an
extra step you don't need. You'll find out that most of your tests go into the
models and that integration tests can be easily grouped into shared examples,
building a clear and readable test suite.
</p> -->
<p>
一開始測試 app 時，我花了精力在 controller 上，現在我不那麼做了。取而代之我只用 RSpec 和 Capybara 建立一些整合測項。
我的想法是你應該測試會被看見的東西，而對 controller 來說測試是多餘的。你會發現大部分的測項與 model 息息相關，同時整合性的測項很容易整理成通用測項，讓你的測試簡明易懂。
</p>
<p>
這個具爭議性的想法在 Ruby 社群中仍未定論，正反雙方都有好理由支持各自的論點。認為 controller 也需要測試的人會告訴你整合測試跑不快，而且無法窮舉所有情況。
</p>
<!-- <p>
Both are wrong. You can easily cover all use cases (why shouldn't you?) and you
can run single file specs using automated tools like Guard. In this way you will run
only the specs you need to test blazing fast without stopping your flow.
</p> -->
<p>
他們錯了。你可以輕易測到所有可能，而且利用 Guard 這類自動化測試工具只執行單一檔案的測項。如此一來只會跑到需要驗證的測項，費時很短，不會擔誤你的 flow。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/14">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | test what you see" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#integration" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#integration" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="should">Description 不提 should</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
Do not use should when describing your tests. Use the third person in the present tense.
Even better start using the new
<a href="http://myronmars.to/n/dev-blog/2012/06/rspecs-new-expectation-syntax">expectation</a>
syntax.
</p> -->
<p>
別在測項描述提到 should，要用第三人稱的現在式。更進一步，你可以開始試用新的 <a href="http://myronmars.to/n/dev-blog/2012/06/rspecs-new-expectation-syntax">expectation</a> 語法。
</p>
<p class="wrong">bad</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">it 'should not change timings' do
consumption.occur_at.should == valid.occur_at
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">it 'does not change timings' do
expect(consumption.occur_at).to equal(valid.occur_at)
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
See <a href="https://github.com/should-not/should_not">the should_not gem</a> for a way to enforce this in RSpec
and <a href="https://github.com/siyelo/should_clean">the should_clean</a> gem for a way to clean up existing RSpec examples that begin with "should."
</p> -->
<p>
請問 <a href="https://github.com/should-not/should_not">should_not</a> 和 <a href="https://github.com/siyelo/should_clean">should_clean</a> 這兩個 gem，他們教你如何在 RSpec 實踐上述原則以及清理手上那些用 "should" 開頭的測項。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/15">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | don't use should" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#should" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#should" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>
<h1><a name="guard">用 guard 自動化測試</a></h1>
<!-- <p>
Running all the test suite every time you change your app can be cumbersome. It takes a lot of
time and it can break your flow. With Guard you can automate your test suite running only the
tests related to the updated spec, model, controller or file you are working at.
</p> -->
<p>
一對程式做了修改就得跑過所有測項可能會成為負擔，這會消秏許多時間而且打斷你的 flow。Guard 可以基於你正在修改的測項本身、model、controller 或是檔案，從完整的測試裡只挑出相關的測項執行。
</p>
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">bundle exec guard
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- Here you can see a sample Guardfile with some basic reloading rules. -->
以下 Guardfile 範例提供一些基本的載入規則。
<p class="correct">good</p>
<div>
<pre><code class="ruby">guard 'rspec', cli: '--drb --format Fuubar --color', version: 2 do
# 執行所有被修改的 spec
watch(%r{^spec/.+_spec\.rb$})
# 執行 lib 裡被修改的 file 對應的 lib spec
watch(%r{^lib/(.+)\.rb$}) { |m| "spec/lib/#{m[1]}_spec.rb" }
# 執行被修改的 model 對應的 model spec
watch(%r{^app/(.+)\.rb$}) { |m| "spec/#{m[1]}_spec.rb" }
# 執行被修改的 view 對應的 view spec
watch(%r{^app/(.*)(\.erb|\.haml)$}) { |m| "spec/#{m[1]}#{m[2]}_spec.rb" }
# 執行與改動的 controller 相關的 integration spec
watch(%r{^app/controllers/(.+)\.rb}) { |m| "spec/requests/#{m[1]}_spec.rb" }
# 當 application controller 改動時執行所有的 integration test
watch('app/controllers/application_controller.rb') { "spec/requests" }
end
</code></pre>
</div>
<!-- <p>
Guard is a fine tool but as usual it doesn't fit all of your needs. Sometimes your TDD workflow
works best with a keybinding that makes it easy to run just the examples you want when you
want to. Then, you can use a rake task to run the entire suite before pushing code.
<a href="https://github.com/myronmarston/vim_files/blob/5bd4faad7c020ebcbf62dcbc59985262b4eacb53/vimrc.after#L61-103">Here</a>
the vim keybinding.
</p> -->
<p>
Guard 好用但不能滿足你所有的需求。有時設一組快速鍵在你想測的時候執行你需要的測項，與你的 TDD 流程更合的來。然後你可以利用 rake task 在 push code 之前跑過完整的測試。這裡有些 <a href="https://github.com/myronmarston/vim_files/blob/5bd4faad7c020ebcbf62dcbc59985262b4eacb53/vimrc.after#L61-103">給 vim 用的快速鍵設定</a>
</p>
<p>
請看更多關於 <a href="https://github.com/guard/guard-rspec">guard-rspec</a> 的資訊。
</p>
<p>
<a href="https://github.com/andreareginato/betterspecs/issues/16">進一步討論由此去 →</a>
</p>
<a href="https://twitter.com/share" data-text="betterspecs.org | automatic tests with guard" href="https://twitter.com/share" data-url="http://betterspecs.org/#guard" class="twitter-share-button" data-related="jasoncosta" data-lang="en" data-size="medium" data-counturl="http://betterspecs.org" data-count="vertical">Tweet</a>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
<div class="fb-like" data-href="http://betterspecs.org/#guard" data-send="false" data-layout="box_count" data-width="450" data-show-faces="true"></div>
</article>
<article>