Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Did you use some tricks to obtain better accuracy than libffm? #3

Open
tcsere07 opened this issue Aug 22, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Did you use some tricks to obtain better accuracy than libffm? #3

tcsere07 opened this issue Aug 22, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@tcsere07
Copy link

Hey @alno , did you use some special tricks to obtain better accuracy than libffm?

I have to say it's really a amazing tool, thanks a lot.

@alno
Copy link
Owner

alno commented Aug 24, 2017

Hi, the only accuracy-related trick i've used is dropout - it reduced overfitting and improved final results.

@tcsere07
Copy link
Author

Hi @alno , Thx for your reply. I used the tool to complete my task and I found that it converged faster than libffm, but it seems that you all used openmp to accumulate the training process, so what's the difference between them? And I also found that Even if I set the same seed, but still got different loss, Why?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants