Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is Ultracopier compatible with server-side copy offload ? #62

Closed
sviscapi opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Is Ultracopier compatible with server-side copy offload ? #62

sviscapi opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@sviscapi
Copy link

Dear @alphaonex86 ,

Is Ultracopier compatible with server-side copy offload ?

https://superuser.com/questions/1361215/how-to-efficiently-transfer-large-files-between-two-remote-locations-on-same-ser

A colleague of mine tried recently to copy a 71GB archive on a remote Windows 2012 server from \remote_server\directory1 to \remote_server\directory2. When using Ultracopier on her Windows 10 client, the copy time was estimated to 4 hours. When using the stock copy / paste function of the OS, the copy was completed in 11 minutes.

Could you please shed some light on this issue ?

Best regards,

Samuel

@alphaonex86
Copy link
Owner

Hi,
The copy data stream pass by Ultracopier to limit the copy speed. But if you need the maximum stream you can try the OS native copy option, this call the native copy by file in internal.
Say me if it help please.
Cheers,

@alphaonex86
Copy link
Owner

image
Os native copy

@sviscapi
Copy link
Author

sviscapi commented May 9, 2022

Dear @alphaonex86 ,

It works like a charm, thank you very much :)

Details about the duration of the transfer seem to be missing when using the OS native copy.

Is it a bug or a missing feature ?

Best regards,

Samuel

@alphaonex86
Copy link
Owner

Bug, I will investigate about this.

@alphaonex86
Copy link
Owner

Fixed into version 2.2.5.1, available now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants