Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
25 lines (18 loc) · 2.77 KB

File metadata and controls

25 lines (18 loc) · 2.77 KB

Understand the Role of Testing in Scrum and Kanban

The table below compares the Scrum and Kanban frameworks, highlighting key structural differences and the tester's role within each.

Methodology

The table will have four columns: "Stage", "Scrum", "Kanban", and "Role of "Tester". Rows include aspects like project structure, work planning, and the tester's role (e.g., dedicated testing phase vs. continuous testing throughout).

STAGE SCRUM KANBAN ROLE OF TESTER
Planning - Product Backlog refinement: Testers participate in defining acceptance criteria for user stories. - Sprint Planning: Testers estimate testing effort and collaborate on the Sprint Backlog. Ongoing process: Testers collaborate with the team to understand upcoming features and provide input on testability. Testers help define what "done" means for a user story from a quality perspective.
Development Development team works on the Sprint Backlog. Work items continuously move through the Kanban board. Testers actively participate in development discussions to understand implementation details. They design and execute test cases based on acceptance criteria.
Review & Retrospective (Scrum) Team showcases completed work from the Sprint in a Sprint Review. Testers provide feedback on the quality of the delivered increment. Daily Stand-up Meetings Testers report progress on testing tasks and identify any blockers.
Testing (implicit in Scrum) No dedicated testing stage. Testing happens throughout the Sprint. Testing happens throughout the workflow. Testers collaborate with developers to fix bugs promptly. Testers execute test cases and identify and report bugs. They collaborate with developers to ensure quality throughout the process.
Release (Scrum) Potentially shippable product increment at the end of the Sprint. Continuous Delivery Continuously deliver work items to production as they are completed and tested.
Improvement Sprint Retrospective: The team reflects on the Sprint and identifies areas for improvement, including testing practices. Continuous Improvement: Testers participate in Kanban board optimization and identify ways to improve testing efficiency. Testers suggest improvements to testing tools, processes, and communication.

Key Differences:

  • Scrum has a fixed-length Sprint cycle, while Kanban is continuous.
  • Scrum has dedicated review and retrospective ceremonies, while Kanban uses daily stand-up meetings for continuous improvement.
  • Testing in Scrum is integrated throughout the Sprint, while Kanban testing is continuous throughout the workflow.

CONCLUSION

In both frameworks, testers play a crucial role in ensuring software quality throughout the development process.