Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uRNN code #1

Closed
casperkaae opened this issue Jan 5, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

uRNN code #1

casperkaae opened this issue Jan 5, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@casperkaae
Copy link

Hi Amar and Martin

I've read your uRNN paper and the following reddit discussion with great interest. At reddit you mention that you have a code that is 4x faster than the one on github.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/3uk2q5/151106464_unitary_evolution_recurrent_neural/cxfwsqw

is the current github version the faster code or is that not released yet?

BR Casper

@martinarjovsky
Copy link
Collaborator

It is indeed the current version on github.

Best,
Martin
On Jan 5, 2016 10:38 AM, "Casper Sønderby" notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi Amar and Martin

I've read your uRNN paper and the following reddit discussion with great
interest. At reddit you mention that you have a code that is 4x faster than
the one on github.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/3uk2q5/151106464_unitary_evolution_recurrent_neural/cxfwsqw

is the current github version the faster code or is that not released yet?

BR Casper


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1.

@casperkaae
Copy link
Author

Great, thanks

The results seems very impressive! Any chance you have some results from experiments on other datasets that you would like to share ?

@martinarjovsky
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks! We do have similar results on other datasets, but they are still a
work in progress as we are trying different new versions of the model. We
will publish them in the future when they are ready.

As a side note to the original comment, we will continue to push
optimization changes as well since there is still room for improvement.

Best!
Martin
On Jan 5, 2016 10:53 AM, "Casper Sønderby" notifications@github.com wrote:

Great, thanks

The results seems very impressive! Any chance you have some results from
experiments on other datasets that you would like to share ?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1 (comment).

@casperkaae
Copy link
Author

Thats good to hear, sometimes it's struggle when leaving MNIST :)

Thanks for sharing the code

BR
Casper

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants