We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
和大家分享《超越感觉》阅读过程中自己印象深刻的点。
仅寻找证实我们的偏见的证据。
当有证据质疑我们的偏见时,选择支持我们偏见的解释,甚至在其它解释更合理的情况下都如此。
应对:搜寻反对以及支持我们偏见的个人,选择最合理的解释,无论该解释是否认同我们的偏见。
应对:提前确定我们会使用的评价标准,始终如一地使用该标准,即使那些数据并不支持我们的观点。
应对:辨识出所有可能的结论,直到获得了足够的证据再来下conclusion。
应对:不要把个人、地点或事物划分为死板类别中。
应对:对你所读所闻的过度简化保持警觉,避免此类思考和表达。
应对:评估所有可能的解释,包括偶然性,再判断。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
和大家分享《超越感觉》阅读过程中自己印象深刻的点。
第10章 过程错误
10.1 带偏见地审视证据
仅寻找证实我们的偏见的证据。
当有证据质疑我们的偏见时,选择支持我们偏见的解释,甚至在其它解释更合理的情况下都如此。
10.2 双标
10.3 草率下conclusion
10.4 过度概括和刻板印象
10.5 过度简化
10.6 事后归因谬误
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: