The forms of सन्स्त् (2.74) should be fixed.

[neeleshb]

The verb सन्स्त् (2.74) has a 3-letter संयोग - न् + स् + त् . Now, whether the last 2 letters "स् + त्" can be separately called a संयोग or not is debatable and both views exist.
How does that matter?
If स् + त् is considered a संयोग on its own, then स्कोः संयोगाद्योरन्ते च will remove the स्, giving forms like सन्ति / सन्त्ति ।
And if स् + त् is not considered a संयोग then we will get current forms, संस्ति / संस्त्ति ।

Both the pathways should be supported.

[akprasad]

@vipranarayan14 this seems like a good first issue! If you're interested, I'll help you through it.

[vipranarayan14]

Yeah I will take this up!