Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Updated README.md with explanation about why black avoids '\' #558

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Updated README.md with explanation about why black avoids '\' #558

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sudheer-g
Copy link

Closes #392

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 10, 2018 •
edited

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 784

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 96.168%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
tests/test_black.py 1 97.83%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 777: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2911
Relevant Lines: 3027
💛 - Coveralls

@sudheer-g
Copy link
Author

Hey! This is my first time writing documentation so if there's anything wrong with the way I've written it or if there are any changes I need to make for it to be good enough please let me know. Thanks.

hugovk
hugovk reviewed Oct 18, 2018
View reviewed changes
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hugovk @sudheer-g
Changed the case of the word 'python' to 'Python'.
d611810 
Co-Authored-By: sudheer-g <bharadwaj.sudheer@gmail.com>
@yhoiseth
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sudheer-g,

Let me know if you'd like some help on this one.

@ambv ambv closed this Mar 3, 2020
@ambv
Copy link
Collaborator

ambv commented Mar 3, 2020

Sorry, this went stale.

@SanketDG SanketDG mentioned this pull request May 9, 2020
Merged
cooperlees pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2020
@SanketDG
Add preference of parantheses over backslashes in docs (#1399)
f6393a2 
Closes #392

Revived from #558

Relevant to #664
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hugovk hugovk hugovk left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Explain why black avoids using \ for code organization
5 participants
@sudheer-g @coveralls @yhoiseth @ambv @hugovk