-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Negative indefinite pronouns #18
Comments
I've wondered about this too. Another thing to consider is using |
Under consensus, we have a few cases of nothing, none and nowhere as a concept. So I sympathize with annotators who transform
This is less superficial, but appears to be in the minority in current annotations. Nathan's idea takes this a step further. Cool.
And we will have to pay close attention to the tricky interaction between quant/any/polarity. |
Presently, we are leaving quantifiers right on the noun phrases, and we are sticking with the surface pronouns. Hold your nose! (And your noise) no one (nobody) is sleeping (s / sleep-01 i don't like anybody (l / like-01 there is nobody that i like (n / nobody everyone is sleeping (s / sleep-01 all people are sleeping (s / sleep-01 i don't like most people (l / like-01 IDEALLY: "x / y" means "there exists an x, which is an instance of y" |
Stick to the negative pronoun or map it to the positive one with negative polarity?
We tended to opt for the 2nd alternative.
nobody/ no one --> positive indefinite pronoun "anyone" OR "somebody" :polarity - ?
nothing --> positive indefinite pronoun "anything" :polarity - ?
none --> "one" OR "any" :polarity -
Could we try to clarify this in the guidelines as there has been some disagreement on this topic?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: