Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FP CVE-2024-20932 on jdk8 #1913

Open
tomersein opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

FP CVE-2024-20932 on jdk8 #1913

tomersein opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working changelog-ignore Don't include this issue in the release changelog false-positive

Comments

@tomersein
Copy link

What happened:
I am scanning an image of alpine 3.20 that contains a dependency of openjdk 8.
I am receiving from Grype 0.74.4\0.78.0 the CVE of CVE-2024-20932.
This CVE according to the DB is related to openjdk17 (alpine remediation) for version < 17.0.10_p7-r0
My version is 8.402.06-r0
I tried to debug, seems like Syft from the one hand tries to guess CPEs and Grype from the other hands does some heuristic which makes the jdk8 become jdk and than matches the mentioned CVE.
The versions seems to be unrelated, which makes me think we have a FP.

What you expected to happen:
Not to find this vulnerability.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
I can't attach the full SBOM, so ill attach only a sample:

"metadata": {
        "package": "openjdk8-jre-lib",
        "originPackage": "openjdk8",
        "maintainer": "Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>",
        "version": "8.402.06-r0",
        "architecture": "x86_64",
        "url": "https://icedtea.classpath.org/",
        "description": "OpenJDK 8 Java Runtime (class libraries)",
        "size": 44155396,
  "distro": {
    "prettyName": "Alpine Linux edge",
    "name": "Alpine Linux",
    "id": "alpine",
    "versionID": "3.20.0_alpha20240329",
    "homeURL": "https://alpinelinux.org/",
    "bugReportURL": "https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues"
  },

Anything else we need to know?:

Environment:

  • Output of grype version: 0.78.0
  • OS (e.g: cat /etc/os-release or similar): alpine 3.20.0
@tomersein tomersein added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 5, 2024
@westonsteimel
Copy link
Contributor

westonsteimel commented Jun 5, 2024

Thanks for the report! The short answer is I think this should be addressed by anchore/cve-data-enrichment@ea0ffb3 when a new grypedb is built and published tomorrow.

To explain a bit more of the detail here - alpine only provides a feed of fixes to vulnerabilities, so in grype we have to pair that with NVD matches in order to get the full picture including potentially unpatched vulnerabilties. That requires transforming from an alpine package name to a set of cpe candidates. NVD is no longer providing CPE node configurations on the majority of new vulnerabilities so we have to do that ourselves, and in this particular case I hadn't captured the lower bound for some of the CPE nodes, so tomorrows update should hopefully fix this particular instance. Also for OpenJDK in particular the NVD CPE data that does exist tends to be rather less than ideal, so we've attempted to improve them in our enrichment effort. So tomorrow the rendered NVD cpe configuration that will be used to build the grype db for CVE-2024-20932 is https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anchore/nvd-data-overrides/a58568aa103fd2a8ab1be6a866f923a37a1142dc/data/2024/CVE-2024-20932.json

@westonsteimel
Copy link
Contributor

westonsteimel commented Jun 5, 2024

thanks for the answer! I am currently using grype 0.74.4, will it require me to upgrade grype?

thanks!

No, just grype db update tomorrow, or it should automatically download the latest db update on a subsequent scan

@westonsteimel westonsteimel added the changelog-ignore Don't include this issue in the release changelog label Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working changelog-ignore Don't include this issue in the release changelog false-positive
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants