You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
with the new changes, testing consim_py/demos/sliding_point_mass.py with both Euler and Exponential simulator, there is a loss in the contact forces in a scenario where constant sliding should occur.
I am currently looking for the source of this difference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this bug is fixed, contactNormal_ and normal_ were used interchangeably in LinearPenaltyContactModel::computeForce(), maybe rename normal_ to normalPenetration_ ?
Hi @andreadelprete,
with the new changes, testing
consim_py/demos/sliding_point_mass.py
with both Euler and Exponential simulator, there is a loss in the contact forces in a scenario where constant sliding should occur.I am currently looking for the source of this difference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: