Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Historic Anthology 1 #108

Closed
fenhl opened this issue Nov 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Historic Anthology 1 #108

fenhl opened this issue Nov 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
investigating under review by contributors set-symbol new symbol!

Comments

@fenhl
Copy link

fenhl commented Nov 21, 2019

An update to MTG Arena which just released introduced the set Historic Anthology 1. Even though the cards show set symbols of previous sets in which they were printed, the set does have its own expansion symbol, as can be seen in the collection viewer:

screenshot of the MTG Arena collection viewer's advanced filters

Note the black square in the background which seems to be part of the symbol, although I'm not sure if it's possible to represent it in a monochrome font.

@andrewgioia
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the screenshot @fenhl. I wish they would stop including backgrounds like that in set symbols and you're right, it won't be possible to do with the current 1 tone glyphs. I will definitely add this symbol though, probably as ha1 unless it indicates something else.

If they are going to be doing a lot of Arena-only sets we could also prefix it as aha1 or something.

@andrewgioia andrewgioia self-assigned this Dec 4, 2019
@andrewgioia andrewgioia added investigating under review by contributors set-symbol new symbol! labels Dec 4, 2019
@andrewgioia
Copy link
Owner

Added in 3.6.3 and SVG included in that release: https://github.com/andrewgioia/Keyrune/blob/master/svg/ha1.svg

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
investigating under review by contributors set-symbol new symbol!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants