You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your library that we use in our company, it is excellent for our needs.
We are currently using the diff function without options, which returns this type of response. However we find it awkward in our context not to have the unmodified values of an array.
I would like to suggest an improvement that would allow to keep the unmodified values in the diff of an object, without returning the whole object.
This would consist in adding an option, for example keepUnchangedValues: boolean, which would be taken into account here in the same way as the full option, while remaining in the context of modified values.
Hi,
Thank you for your library that we use in our company, it is excellent for our needs.
We are currently using the diff function without options, which returns this type of response. However we find it awkward in our context not to have the unmodified values of an array.
We have tested the
full
option, which is not adapted to our case because it returns the whole object, with the values out of context.I would like to suggest an improvement that would allow to keep the unmodified values in the diff of an object, without returning the whole object.
This would consist in adding an option, for example
keepUnchangedValues: boolean
, which would be taken into account here in the same way as thefull
option, while remaining in the context of modified values.ideal answer will look like that:
What do you think of this option which would bring a lot of clarity in the context of the modified values scope?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: