New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build(aio): fix addNotYetDocumentedProperty
processor
#22770
build(aio): fix addNotYetDocumentedProperty
processor
#22770
Conversation
It was running too late and so was being confused by the description being split into `shortDescription` and `description` properties. Closes angular#22748
You can preview 5b2b04f at https://pr22770-5b2b04f.ngbuilds.io/. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, what about doc.constructorDoc
and doc.members
?
These are now covered by the |
But afaict, there is this difference with how it worked before:
Did I miss something? Does that affect something in practice? Was it intentional? |
That is true - also of members. I.E. if any constructor or member had docs then we don't mark the container. |
One last thing: What happens if there is a |
At this point (https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/22770/files#diff-b55272a29cea0094031753ed50026aeeR5) we explicitly configure the processor to run before the |
Doh! I thought |
It was running too late and so was being confused by the description being split into `shortDescription` and `description` properties. Closes angular#22748 PR Close angular#22770
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
It was running too late and so was being confused by the
description being split into
shortDescription
anddescription
properties.
I also took the opportunity to simplify it and make the docTypes configurable.
Closes #22748