Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ivy): save queries at the correct indices #28327

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kara
Copy link
Contributor

@kara kara commented Jan 24, 2019

Previous to this change, we were storing view queries at the
wrong index. This is because we were passing a raw index to the
store() instruction instead of an adjusted index (i.e. an
index that does not include the HEADER_OFFSET). We had an
additional issue where TView.blueprint was not backfilled
when TView.data was backfilled, so new component instances
created from the blueprint would end up having a shorter LView.
Both of these problems together led to the Material demo app
failing with Ivy. This commit fixes those discrepancies.

@kara kara requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2019 02:14
@kara kara force-pushed the queryFix branch 2 times, most recently from 8ccaa94 to 417f155 Compare January 24, 2019 02:19
@AndrewKushnir
Copy link
Contributor

Presubmit

@kara
Copy link
Contributor Author

kara commented Jan 24, 2019

Newer presubmit

Previous to this change, we were storing view queries at the
wrong index. This is because we were passing a raw index to the
store() instruction instead of an adjusted index (i.e. an
index that does not include the HEADER_OFFSET). We had an
additional issue where TView.blueprint was not backfilled
when TView.data was backfilled, so new component instances
created from the blueprint would end up having a shorter LView.
Both of these problems together led to the Material demo app
failing with Ivy. This commit fixes those discrepancies.
@kara kara added action: review The PR is still awaiting reviews from at least one requested reviewer target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release comp: ivy and removed state: WIP labels Jan 24, 2019
@ngbot ngbot bot added this to the needsTriage milestone Jan 24, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@AndrewKushnir AndrewKushnir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@kara kara added action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed action: review The PR is still awaiting reviews from at least one requested reviewer labels Jan 24, 2019
@jasonaden jasonaden closed this in c1fb9c2 Jan 24, 2019
vetom pushed a commit to vetom/angular that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2019
Previous to this change, we were storing view queries at the
wrong index. This is because we were passing a raw index to the
store() instruction instead of an adjusted index (i.e. an
index that does not include the HEADER_OFFSET). We had an
additional issue where TView.blueprint was not backfilled
when TView.data was backfilled, so new component instances
created from the blueprint would end up having a shorter LView.
Both of these problems together led to the Material demo app
failing with Ivy. This commit fixes those discrepancies.

PR Close angular#28327
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants