Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(material-experimental/mdc-list): fix secondary line accidentally wrapping text #23236

Merged

Conversation

devversion
Copy link
Member

MDC currently supports three-line list items in a way where
they assume that the second list line should wrap into
a third line. This is not suitable for our MDC-based list
because it would result in an incompatibility with the non-MDC
list and as per Material Design spec it is a supported case
to have a third list line that is decoupled from the second line.

The spec describes multiple variants for a three-line list, and
MDC is not off the spec here, but just doesn't support our
three-line list variant yet. It is planned to continue discussion
with the MDC team to push forward on the other three-line variants.

Note for team: I've added a new item to the agenda. I've been chatting
with Brandon from the MDC a little about this. They are open in supporting
the variant we need for our MDC-based list, but are looking for arguments
in order to prioritize the variant we need.

…wrapping text

MDC currently supports three-line list items in a way where
they assume that the second list line should wrap into
a third line. This is not suitable for our MDC-based list
because it would result in an incompatibility with the non-MDC
list and as per Material Design spec it is a supported case
to have a third list line that is decoupled from the second line.

The spec describes multiple variants for a three-line list, and
MDC is not off the spec here, but just doesn't support our
three-line list variant yet. It is planned to continue discussion
with the MDC team to push forward on the other three-line variants.
@devversion devversion added P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Jul 23, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jul 23, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@mmalerba mmalerba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mmalerba mmalerba added the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label Jul 23, 2021
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mmalerba mmalerba merged commit 74d08cf into angular:master Jul 27, 2021
mmalerba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2021
…wrapping text (#23236)

MDC currently supports three-line list items in a way where
they assume that the second list line should wrap into
a third line. This is not suitable for our MDC-based list
because it would result in an incompatibility with the non-MDC
list and as per Material Design spec it is a supported case
to have a third list line that is decoupled from the second line.

The spec describes multiple variants for a three-line list, and
MDC is not off the spec here, but just doesn't support our
three-line list variant yet. It is planned to continue discussion
with the MDC team to push forward on the other three-line variants.

(cherry picked from commit 74d08cf)
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 27, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants