namespace classes

[millermedeiros]

I think it's a good idea to namespace all the classNames to avoid name collisions (eg. .anim-flash, .anim-fadeOut, etc..) - it will be also easier to identify that class is only used for animation purposes.

see SMACSS explanation about different types of rules.

PS: didn't suggested .a-flash, .a-fadeOut because a is ambiguous (link element <a>).

[daneden]

I'll consider this, but I don't think it will cause too much of a problem. Only the animation name is declared in these classes, no other properties, so the animation won't execute unless the user specifies it themselves.

I also wanted to maintain as much consistency between the class names and the animation names as possible.

[millermedeiros]

The name collision is if for some reason the user have a class that have the same name but does something different. - i.e. adding a class flash would also make the element change the color or it would affect all the flash movies on the page (that already have a class flash on all the elements)

PS: jQueryUI starts all their classes with ui- for instance.

[Domw]

Namespacing is probably a good idea, I prefer camel case over dashes myself. e.g .animFadeOut

[daneden]

I'm going to continue using the classes currently implemented. I've received no requests outside of this issue for namespaces, and the classes provided by animate.css contain no rules that risk overwriting any user set rules.