You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I tried to train "CP transformer w/ pre-training" by processed data you offered in repo from scratch.
I used 1e-4 as pretraining learning rate, and selected loss_30.ckpt, and then trained it on EMOPIA dataset by 1e-5 learning rate.
But I couldn't found further detail about surface-level objective metrics , like how many clips for each clip types for evaluation, and which loss checkpoint you used for evaluation...etc.
To reproduce the surface-level objective metrics, I used the loss_25.ckpt w/ pre-training and generated by 4Q condition, each for 100 clips, and used muspy to get PR/NPC/POLY results (46.585/ 8.51/ 4.040805902072384 for each).
In the paper, the results are below.
**
**
Was there anything I didn't notice in training or evaluation?
And could you please provide the detail for doing this surface-level objective metrics evaluation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi. The general idea of choosing the number of clips to do evaluation is just so that each class has some decent amount of data, and 100 is about right. As for the choice of the checkpoint, since we used loss_30 for further training on EMOPIA, you can expect the loss of the checkpoint to be lower than 30.
Hi,
I tried to train "CP transformer w/ pre-training" by processed data you offered in repo from scratch.
I used 1e-4 as pretraining learning rate, and selected loss_30.ckpt, and then trained it on EMOPIA dataset by 1e-5 learning rate.
But I couldn't found further detail about surface-level objective metrics , like how many clips for each clip types for evaluation, and which loss checkpoint you used for evaluation...etc.
To reproduce the surface-level objective metrics, I used the loss_25.ckpt w/ pre-training and generated by 4Q condition, each for 100 clips, and used muspy to get PR/NPC/POLY results (46.585/ 8.51/ 4.040805902072384 for each).
In the paper, the results are below.
**
**
Was there anything I didn't notice in training or evaluation?
And could you please provide the detail for doing this surface-level objective metrics evaluation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: