Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[dsp] better reference the cutoff -> filter coeff transfer function for one-pole filter? #8

Open
anokta opened this issue Jun 3, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

[dsp] better reference the cutoff -> filter coeff transfer function for one-pole filter? #8

anokta opened this issue Jun 3, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@anokta
Labels
question learn things
Milestone
backlog

Comments

@anokta
Copy link
Owner

anokta commented Jun 3, 2018

while the current method seems to be working okay overall, might be worth revisiting the calculation later on.
@anokta anokta added the question learn things label Jun 3, 2018
@anokta anokta self-assigned this Jun 3, 2018
@anokta anokta added this to the backlog milestone Jan 6, 2020
@anokta anokta changed the title better reference the cutoff -> filter coeff transfer function for one-pole filter? [dsp] better reference the cutoff -> filter coeff transfer function for one-pole filter? Feb 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@anokta anokta

Labels
question learn things
Projects
None yet
Milestone
backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@anokta