Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The accuracy of IDLoss experiment is much lower than 65.33% of the paper #16

Closed
xie-xue opened this issue Apr 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

The accuracy of IDLoss experiment is much lower than 65.33% of the paper #16

xie-xue opened this issue Apr 21, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@xie-xue
Copy link

xie-xue commented Apr 21, 2023

parameter
loss_names='id'
lr=1e-05
lr_factor=5.0
Concrete result
image
Looking forward to your reply！
@anosorae
Copy link
Owner

The id loss in the table is not a separate loss, but is trained jointly with the itc loss in the baseline.

@xie-xue
Copy link
Author

xie-xue commented Apr 21, 2023

Thank you

@shams2023 shams2023 mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@anosorae @xie-xue