We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The health_check_path option is ignored on an existing target group. Changing it gives a status of ok and the setting is not changed.
health_check_path
ok
I suspect this affects more health check options but haven't tried them.
Turns out this is a duplicate of ansible/ansible#50024
You have to supply health_check_protocol in order for health_check_path to be considered.
health_check_protocol
But the documentation still doesn't reflect that.
And really, the purpose of the check is to ignore params that only apply to http and https protocols. The check should:
http
https
protocol
So I think this should remain open.
elb_target_group
2.9
changed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This and the other issues should reside in https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.aws not here as they are community supported modules.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@wimnat thanks I thought I had moved the rest but it turns out I only did one of them.
I think #8 should stay here though, as the problem resides in the module util backing both modules, not in the modules themselves.
This issue closed in favor of ansible-collections/community.aws#29
No branches or pull requests
SUMMARY
Thehealth_check_path
option is ignored on an existing target group. Changing it gives a status ofok
and the setting is not changed.I suspect this affects more health check options but haven't tried them.
Turns out this is a duplicate of ansible/ansible#50024
You have to supply
health_check_protocol
in order forhealth_check_path
to be considered.But the documentation still doesn't reflect that.
And really, the purpose of the check is to ignore params that only apply to
http
andhttps
protocols. The check should:health_check_protocol
is the same asprotocol
if the former is not supplied, since that's what happens in realitySo I think this should remain open.
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
elb_target_group
ANSIBLE VERSION
2.9
CONFIGURATION
OS / ENVIRONMENT
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
health_check_path
option to something elseEXPECTED RESULTS
changed
status with updated valueACTUAL RESULTS
ok
status with no changeThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: