-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use vault_id when encrypted via vault-edit #30772
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ansibot
added
affects_2.5
This issue/PR affects Ansible v2.5
bugfix_pull_request
needs_triage
Needs a first human triage before being processed.
parsing/vault/
support:core
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team.
needs_revision
This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR.
labels
Sep 22, 2017
bcoca
removed
the
needs_triage
Needs a first human triage before being processed.
label
Sep 25, 2017
lgtm, though the new tests seem to be failing |
On the encryption stage of 'ansible-vault edit --vault-id=someid@passfile somefile', the vault id was not being passed to encrypt() so the files were always saved with the default vault id in the 1.1 version format. When trying to edit that file a second time, also with a --vault-id, the file would be decrypted with the secret associated with the provided vault-id, but since the encrypted file had no vault id in the envelope there would be no match for 'default' secrets. (Only the --vault-id was included in the potential matches, so the vault id actually used to decrypt was not). If that list was empty, there would be an IndexError when trying to encrypted the changed file. This would result in the displayed error: ERROR! Unexpected Exception, this is probably a bug: list index out of range Fix is two parts: 1) use the vault id when encrypting from edit 2) when matching the secret to use for encrypting after edit, include the vault id that was used for decryption and not just the vault id (or lack of vault id) from the envelope. add unit tests for #30575 and intg tests for 'ansible-vault edit' Fixes #30575
ansibot
removed
the
needs_revision
This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR.
label
Sep 26, 2017
alikins
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2017
* Use vault_id when encrypted via vault-edit On the encryption stage of 'ansible-vault edit --vault-id=someid@passfile somefile', the vault id was not being passed to encrypt() so the files were always saved with the default vault id in the 1.1 version format. When trying to edit that file a second time, also with a --vault-id, the file would be decrypted with the secret associated with the provided vault-id, but since the encrypted file had no vault id in the envelope there would be no match for 'default' secrets. (Only the --vault-id was included in the potential matches, so the vault id actually used to decrypt was not). If that list was empty, there would be an IndexError when trying to encrypted the changed file. This would result in the displayed error: ERROR! Unexpected Exception, this is probably a bug: list index out of range Fix is two parts: 1) use the vault id when encrypting from edit 2) when matching the secret to use for encrypting after edit, include the vault id that was used for decryption and not just the vault id (or lack of vault id) from the envelope. add unit tests for #30575 and intg tests for 'ansible-vault edit' Fixes #30575 (cherry picked from commit a14d0f3)
prasadkatti
pushed a commit
to prasadkatti/ansible
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2017
* Use vault_id when encrypted via vault-edit On the encryption stage of 'ansible-vault edit --vault-id=someid@passfile somefile', the vault id was not being passed to encrypt() so the files were always saved with the default vault id in the 1.1 version format. When trying to edit that file a second time, also with a --vault-id, the file would be decrypted with the secret associated with the provided vault-id, but since the encrypted file had no vault id in the envelope there would be no match for 'default' secrets. (Only the --vault-id was included in the potential matches, so the vault id actually used to decrypt was not). If that list was empty, there would be an IndexError when trying to encrypted the changed file. This would result in the displayed error: ERROR! Unexpected Exception, this is probably a bug: list index out of range Fix is two parts: 1) use the vault id when encrypting from edit 2) when matching the secret to use for encrypting after edit, include the vault id that was used for decryption and not just the vault id (or lack of vault id) from the envelope. add unit tests for ansible#30575 and intg tests for 'ansible-vault edit' Fixes ansible#30575
BondAnthony
pushed a commit
to BondAnthony/ansible
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2017
* Use vault_id when encrypted via vault-edit On the encryption stage of 'ansible-vault edit --vault-id=someid@passfile somefile', the vault id was not being passed to encrypt() so the files were always saved with the default vault id in the 1.1 version format. When trying to edit that file a second time, also with a --vault-id, the file would be decrypted with the secret associated with the provided vault-id, but since the encrypted file had no vault id in the envelope there would be no match for 'default' secrets. (Only the --vault-id was included in the potential matches, so the vault id actually used to decrypt was not). If that list was empty, there would be an IndexError when trying to encrypted the changed file. This would result in the displayed error: ERROR! Unexpected Exception, this is probably a bug: list index out of range Fix is two parts: 1) use the vault id when encrypting from edit 2) when matching the secret to use for encrypting after edit, include the vault id that was used for decryption and not just the vault id (or lack of vault id) from the envelope. add unit tests for ansible#30575 and intg tests for 'ansible-vault edit' Fixes ansible#30575
ansibot
added
bug
This issue/PR relates to a bug.
and removed
bugfix_pull_request
labels
Mar 6, 2018
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
affects_2.5
This issue/PR affects Ansible v2.5
bug
This issue/PR relates to a bug.
parsing/vault/
support:core
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SUMMARY
Use vault_id when encrypted via vault-edit
On the encryption stage of
'ansible-vault edit --vault-id=someid@passfile somefile',
the vault id was not being passed to encrypt() so the files were
always saved with the default vault id in the 1.1 version format.
When trying to edit that file a second time, also with a --vault-id,
the file would be decrypted with the secret associated with the
provided vault-id, but since the encrypted file had no vault id
in the envelope there would be no match for 'default' secrets.
(Only the --vault-id was included in the potential matches, so
the vault id actually used to decrypt was not).
If that list was empty, there would be an IndexError when trying
to encrypted the changed file. This would result in the displayed
error:
Fix is two parts:
use the vault id when encrypting from edit
when matching the secret to use for encrypting after edit,
include the vault id that was used for decryption and not just
the vault id (or lack of vault id) from the envelope.
add unit tests for #30575 and intg tests for 'ansible-vault edit'
Fixes #30575
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
lib/ansible/parsing/vault/
ANSIBLE VERSION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION