Module zabbix_action maintenance_status requires unavailable operator

[sawicchiraw]

SUMMARY

ISSUE TYPE

• Bug Report

COMPONENT NAME

zabbix_action

ANSIBLE VERSION

ansible 2.8.2
  config file = None
  configured module search path = ['/root/.ansible/plugins/modules', '/usr/share/ansible/plugins/modules']
  ansible python module location = /usr/local/lib/python3.5/dist-packages/ansible
  executable location = /usr/local/bin/ansible
  python version = 3.5.2 (default, Nov 12 2018, 13:43:14) [GCC 5.4.0 20160609]

CONFIGURATION

        conditions:
          - type: 'maintenance_status'
            operator: 'No'
            value: ''
            formulaid: A

OS / ENVIRONMENT

Linux zabbix 4.4.0-154-generic #181-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 25 05:29:03 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

STEPS TO REPRODUCE

zabbix 4.0, zabbix api Action object
https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/4.0/manual/api/reference/action/object
When Action operation-conditiontype is 16 - problem is suppressed, it requires new operator "10 - Yes; or 11 - No. "

lib/python3.5/dist-packages/ansible/modules/monitoring/zabbix/zabbix_action.py
line 1391~
try:
return to_numeric_value([
"=",
"<>",
"like",
"not like",
"in",
">=",
"<=",
"not in",
"dammy 8",
"dammy 9",
"Yes",
"No"], _condition['operator']
)

then I can add zabbix action with maintenance_status

EXPECTED RESULTS

ACTUAL RESULTS

[ansibot]

Files identified in the description:

• lib/ansible/modules/monitoring/zabbix/zabbix_action.py

If these files are inaccurate, please update the component name section of the description or use the !component bot command.

click here for bot help

[ansibot]

cc @D3DeFi @K-dot @eikef @rubentsirunyan
click here for bot help

[D3DeFi]

Hello, thank you for reporting this. @rubentsirunyan will you have time to look at this please?

[D3DeFi]

needs_contributor

[ansibot]

cc @sky-joker
click here for bot help

[D3DeFi]

This issue has been moved to a collection repository for Zabbix content:
ansible-collections/community.zabbix#30

Please continue any further discussion there.

close_me