Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AWX Office Hours Agenda - Dec 13 2022 #13240

Closed
john-westcott-iv opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed

AWX Office Hours Agenda - Dec 13 2022 #13240

john-westcott-iv opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@john-westcott-iv
Copy link
Member

john-westcott-iv commented Nov 28, 2022

AWX Office Hours

Proposed agenda based on topics

  • Welcome @john-westcott-iv
  • Gundalow monolog - Quick overview AAP moving to a central (shared) UI component. @gundalow
  • Discussion: Helm development for AWX-Operator @miles-w-3
  • Discussion: Solution for injecting complex extra vars @philipsd6
  • Update: Add retry mechanism to handle intermittent connection issues with Kubernetes logging stream @TheRealHaoLiu
  • Discussion: Issue label for incompliance with Ansible @ng-bsy
  • Call to actions @TheRealHaoLiu
    • Receptor PR, please try
    • Youtube suggestions
    • RDU Ansible Meetups Resuming Jan 2023

What

After a successful Contributor Summit in October, one of the bits of feedback we got was to host a regular time for the Automation Controller (AWX) Team to be available for your folks in the AWX Community, so we are happy to announce a new regular video meeting.

This kind of feedback loop is vital to the success of AWX and the AWX team wants to make it as easy as possible for you - our community - to get involved.

Where & When

Our second meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 13th, 2022 at 1500 UTC

This meeting is held once a month, on the second Tuesday of the month, at 1500 UTC

How

Add one topic per comment in this GitHub issue

If you don't have a GitHub account, jump on #awx:ansible.com on Matrix and we can add the topic for you

Talk with us

As well as the fortnightly video meeting you can join the Community (inc development team) on Matrix Chat.

  • Matrix: #awx:ansible.com (recomended)
  • libera.chat IRC: #ansible-awx (If you are already setup on IRC)

The Matrix & IRC channels are bridged, you'll just have a better experience on Matrix

Links

AWX YouTube Chanel
Previous Meeting
Meeting recording
Next Meeting

See you soon!

@TheRealHaoLiu
Copy link
Member

TheRealHaoLiu commented Nov 28, 2022

Add retry mechanism to handle intermittent connection issues with Kubernetes logging stream

ansible/receptor#683

@TheRealHaoLiu
Copy link
Member

Proposal: Decouple Rsyslog from web and task subsystem

#13183

@TheRealHaoLiu
Copy link
Member

Call to action: AWX YouTube Channel Content Request

#13242

@AlanCoding
Copy link
Member

Discussion: solution for smart inventory hostvars issue

#371

#1999

There are major technical reasons it's unlikely we'll fix both of those issues with updates to smart inventory. I am working on a proposal that we solve the problem via a new inventory type, #13214, combined with a new inventory source type that allows using the constructed inventory plugin. Since so many users reported that the problem is a blocker for using smart inventory, I thought we could get meaningful feedback on the solution approach.

@philipsd6
Copy link
Contributor

Discussion: solution for injecting complex extra vars

#1965 opened Jun 6, 2018
#13070 opened after recent Ansible Summit discussion

The original issue was opened 3.5 years ago and @ryanpetrello suggested that:

…if we wanted to do this, we'd probably have to write something that crawled the data structure and did replacement on strings nested inside, which could get hairy.

I've opened PR #13267 resolving both issues, and I thought we could get some feedback on the hairiness, before I continue with adjusting the JSON validator and adding tests.

@fosterseth fosterseth unpinned this issue Dec 2, 2022
@miles-w-3
Copy link

Discussion: Helm development for AWX-Operator

Since last spring, work has been done to add

Currently, the main limitation of the chart is that it’s compiled from the kustomize resources, and the operator handles most resource creation while it is running. These items lead to confusion about elements of chart development

Possible considerations:

  • Should the helm chart live in its own repo? That would allow chart-releaser to be used, might clean up versioning
  • Should resources be managed in helm rather than kustomize? Likely a workflow adjustment for some people, but would make the chart more full-featured - what is the impact of a change like this?

@TheRealHaoLiu TheRealHaoLiu pinned this issue Dec 6, 2022
@john-westcott-iv
Copy link
Member Author

Discuss idea in #13272

@gundalow
Copy link
Contributor

gundalow commented Dec 8, 2022

Quick overview AAP moving to a central (shared) UI component.

@relrod relrod closed this as completed Dec 16, 2022
@relrod relrod unpinned this issue Dec 16, 2022
@ansible ansible locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants