copy dependent files relative to source module file #494
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jul 25, 2019
This was referenced Sep 23, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was trying to fix errors in modules that use _cffi_backend like PIL, cryptography and bcrypt. _cffi_backend needs a libffi*.so.* file in a specific subfolder, and PIL needs it either in libs/PIL/.libs or lib/.libs when zip_include_packages = ["*"]
With this patch it was possible to reduce the hooks for PIL and cffi.
I ended up making a little fuss about submitting the patches on cffi and PIL.
For PIL, it had already closed patch #480 and sent a new #491
For cffi I will fix #479