New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge extra_init_by_lua_start
and extra_init_by_lua
directive in test cases
#7990
Comments
/assign |
Hello @spacewander if this issue is still open, please assign it to me, The
This implementation moves the code from |
Simply moving the code from extra_init_by_lua_start to extra_init_by_lua doesn't work. |
We have tried it. |
Ok, thanks for updating. Exploring for another solutions. |
Hello @spacewander one probable solution may be, we can create a new directive called
the code from |
You can try it. |
So, I can create PR for this, please assign it to me? |
|
I take a look at it, it doesn't work. |
Discussed in #7988
Originally posted by monkeyDluffy6017 September 26, 2022
Maybe we should merge
extra_init_by_lua_start
andextra_init_by_lua
directives in test cases, they are just different on position.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: