Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve SELECT text performance #177

Open
kou opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Improve SELECT text performance #177

kou opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@kou
Copy link
Member

kou commented Nov 20, 2023

It's slower than the PostgreSQL protocol.

The followings may be related but we need to look into it:

@davidhcoe
Copy link

I was wondering if there is an update on this for the performance comparison. And whether any research had gone in to whether this might work with https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb.

@kou
Copy link
Member Author

kou commented Mar 22, 2024

I have some more ideas (e.g. internal naive ring buffer implementation may be bottleneck) but I haven't worked on this so much yet.

I haven't tried this with TimescaleDB but it will work because this doesn't care about executed SELECT.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants