conbench-apache-arrow / Conbench performance report
failed
Oct 10, 2023 in 0s
Found 1 regression
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 76f987e.
Benchmarks with performance regressions
There was 1 possible performance regression, according to the lookback z-score method.
Benchmarks with regressions:
- Commit Run on
ursa-i9-9960x
at 2023-10-10 03:13:40Z
All benchmark runs analyzed:
- Commit Run on
ursa-i9-9960x
at 2023-10-10 03:13:40Z - Commit Run on
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
at 2023-10-10 05:56:00Z - Commit Run on
ec2-m5-4xlarge-us-east-2
at 2023-10-09 04:56:46Z - Commit Run on
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
at 2023-10-09 04:46:52Z - Commit Run on
arm64-t4g-linux-compute
at 2023-10-09 05:33:09Z - Commit Run on
arm64-m6g-linux-compute
at 2023-10-09 05:29:30Z
Unstable benchmarks with performance regressions
The following benchmark results indicate a possible performance regression, but are known to sometimes produce false positives when applying the lookback z-score analysis.
-
Commit Run on
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
at 2023-10-10 05:56:00Z -
Commit Run on
arm64-m6g-linux-compute
at 2023-10-09 05:29:30ZConstants
(C++) with source=cpp-micro, suite=arrow-decimal-benchmarkBM_ComputeHash
(C++) with params=, source=cpp-micro, suite=parquet-bloom-filter-benchmarkBM_ComputeHash
(C++) with params=, source=cpp-micro, suite=parquet-bloom-filter-benchmarkBM_ComputeHash
(C++) with params=, source=cpp-micro, suite=parquet-bloom-filter-benchmarkBM_ComputeHash
(C++) with params=, source=cpp-micro, suite=parquet-bloom-filter-benchmarkBM_ComputeHash
(C++) with params=, source=cpp-micro, suite=parquet-bloom-filter-benchmark
Details
This report was generated using the lookback z-score method with a z-score threshold of 30.0.
Loading