Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Support loading a different model/key for RunInference #27628

Closed
1 of 15 tasks
damccorm opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #28327
Closed
1 of 15 tasks

[Feature Request]: Support loading a different model/key for RunInference #27628

damccorm opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #28327
Assignees
Labels
done & done Issue has been reviewed after it was closed for verification, followups, etc. new feature P2 python

Comments

@damccorm
Copy link
Contributor

What would you like to happen?

Today, many users have pipelines that choose a single model for inference from 100s or 1000s of models based on properties of the data. Unfortunately, RunInference does not support this use case. We should support a new use case for RunInference that allows a single keyed RunInference transform to serve a different model for each key.

See design doc here - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kj3FyWRbJu1KhViX07Z0Gk0MU0842jhYRhI-DMhhcv4/edit?usp=sharing

Issue Priority

Priority: 2 (default / most feature requests should be filed as P2)

Issue Components

  • Component: Python SDK
  • Component: Java SDK
  • Component: Go SDK
  • Component: Typescript SDK
  • Component: IO connector
  • Component: Beam examples
  • Component: Beam playground
  • Component: Beam katas
  • Component: Website
  • Component: Spark Runner
  • Component: Flink Runner
  • Component: Samza Runner
  • Component: Twister2 Runner
  • Component: Hazelcast Jet Runner
  • Component: Google Cloud Dataflow Runner
@damccorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

damccorm commented Aug 11, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
done & done Issue has been reviewed after it was closed for verification, followups, etc. new feature P2 python
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants