You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are investigating using bookkeeper as a storage component for our metadata service. However our infrastructure only uses Etcd and Kubernetes. we would like that bookkeeper can run with Etcd, we don't want to use and operate zookeeper.
After talked to @jiazhai and @sijie, they pointed us to @sijie's prototype on Etcd #1114 . I have implemented the Etcd metadata driver, and would like to share it with the community and continue the development in the community, while we are investigating the usage of bookkeeper.
Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
nice-to-have
Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
Be able to run bookkeeper with Etcd.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FEATURE REQUEST
We are investigating using bookkeeper as a storage component for our metadata service. However our infrastructure only uses Etcd and Kubernetes. we would like that bookkeeper can run with Etcd, we don't want to use and operate zookeeper.
After talked to @jiazhai and @sijie, they pointed us to @sijie's prototype on Etcd #1114 . I have implemented the Etcd metadata driver, and would like to share it with the community and continue the development in the community, while we are investigating the usage of bookkeeper.
nice-to-have
Be able to run bookkeeper with Etcd.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: