Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Documentation: Add information in active branches, about what is the camel-k version using the catalog #632

Closed
oscerd opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Documentation: Add information in active branches, about what is the camel-k version using the catalog #632

oscerd opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 6 comments
Assignees
@djencks
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Milestone
0.7.0

Comments

@oscerd
Copy link
Contributor

oscerd commented Dec 15, 2021

No description provided.

@oscerd oscerd added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 15, 2021
@oscerd oscerd self-assigned this Dec 15, 2021
@djencks
Copy link
Contributor

djencks commented Dec 15, 2021

Is this a sub-task of apache/camel-website#701? I was planning on tackling that next.

@oscerd
Copy link
Contributor Author

oscerd commented Dec 15, 2021

Yes, i forgot to link the website issue. Thanks for it. Feel free to assign to yourself :-)

@djencks djencks self-assigned this Dec 15, 2021
@oscerd oscerd removed their assignment Dec 17, 2021
@oscerd oscerd added this to the 0.7.0 milestone Dec 20, 2021
@oscerd
Copy link
Contributor Author

oscerd commented Jan 13, 2022

@djencks is this done?

@djencks
Copy link
Contributor

djencks commented Jan 13, 2022

This is not yet implemented. I'll try for today or tomorrow.

@djencks
Copy link
Contributor

djencks commented Jan 14, 2022

I implemented this in some PRs mentioning the camel-website issue, preview should be at https://pr-747--camel.netlify.app shortly, however I fear that it will be extremely hard to keep these back-references updated correctly since the information is from another project.

@djencks
Copy link
Contributor

djencks commented Jan 14, 2022

I think this is done with the aforementioned PRs.

@djencks djencks closed this as completed Jan 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@djencks djencks

Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.7.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@djencks @oscerd