Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BEAM-433] Remove Dataflow references in ExampleOptions #301

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

peihe
Copy link
Contributor

@peihe peihe commented May 6, 2016

No description provided.

@peihe peihe force-pushed the example-options branch 3 times, most recently from 4d3fd36 to 21b84a6 Compare May 6, 2016 20:48
*/
public interface DataflowExampleOptions extends DataflowPipelineOptions {
public interface ExampleOptions extends PipelineOptions {
@Description("Whether to keep jobs running on the Dataflow service after local process exit")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line references Dataflow-- should we remove it entirely?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated the description for now.

I am not removing references to this options, since it might be useful for other runners.

@peihe
Copy link
Contributor Author

peihe commented May 6, 2016

not ready for review yet
It depends on other PRs to get in first.

@peihe peihe force-pushed the example-options branch 3 times, most recently from 1c032cc to 49b519c Compare July 8, 2016 18:34
@peihe peihe changed the title Remove Dataflow references in ExampleOptions [BEAM-433] Remove Dataflow references in ExampleOptions Jul 8, 2016
@peihe
Copy link
Contributor Author

peihe commented Jul 27, 2016

obsolete

@peihe peihe closed this Jul 27, 2016
@peihe peihe deleted the example-options branch August 21, 2017 02:26
iemejia pushed a commit to iemejia/beam that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants