Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed bug which palo can't compiled by JDK 10, added the compile parameter CPPFLAGS of ncurses-6.0, prevent compilation error #214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 20, 2018

Conversation

HappenLee
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…ter CPPFLAGS of ncurses-6.0, prevent compilation error
@dave2wave
Copy link
Member

Doris team here is an open Pull Request

@muyuhang muyuhang closed this Sep 14, 2018
@muyuhang muyuhang reopened this Sep 14, 2018
@morningman
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, we already accepted this pull request on our private code repo. We are currently trying to find a better way to merge our private code to the apache repo, to avoid chaos on merging code. it may take a while.

@dave2wave
Copy link
Member

Please discuss this process and structure on the dev list. I'd like to understand what the challenges are so that the solution worked out is the best. Keep in mind that the Baidu/palo repository was what was granted to the Apache Software Foundation and one task will be to make sure that all source files have all the proper headers, etc.

@lide-reed lide-reed merged commit 9ac1669 into apache:master Sep 20, 2018
starocean999 pushed a commit to starocean999/incubator-doris that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2023
yiguolei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
Current multi-window plan generation has problem on the project sequence, for example:

+--LogicalWindow ( windowExpressions=[avg(sum_sales#115) WindowSpec(...) AS `avg_monthly_sales`#116, rank() WindowSpec(...) AS `rn`#117], ...)
and correspond physical plan is:

+--PhysicalWindow[6572]@16 ( windowFrameGroup=(Funcs=[avg(sum_sales#115) WindowSpec(...) AS `avg_monthly_sales`#116], ... )
    +--PhysicalWindow[6568]@29 ( windowFrameGroup=(Funcs=[rank() WindowSpec(...) AS `rn`#117], ...] )
If the final plan is generated as following:

MultiCastDataSinks
STREAM DATA SINK
  EXCHANGE ID: 20
  HASH_PARTITIONED: rn[#208], i_brand[#202], cc_name[#203], i_category[#201]
Before we eventually resolve the multi-window issue, we add a projection as following and force a mapping but this will not cover all potential problems.

MultiCastDataSinks
STREAM DATA SINK
  EXCHANGE ID: 20
  HASH_PARTITIONED: rn[#219], i_brand[#213], cc_name[#214], i_category[#212]
  PROJECTIONS: i_category[#184], i_brand[#185], cc_name[#186], d_year[#187], d_moy[#188], sum_sales[#189], avg_monthly_sales[#191], rn[#190]
  PROJECTION TUPLE: 20
vinlee19 pushed a commit to vinlee19/doris that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
…24912)

Current multi-window plan generation has problem on the project sequence, for example:

+--LogicalWindow ( windowExpressions=[avg(sum_sales#115) WindowSpec(...) AS `avg_monthly_sales`apache#116, rank() WindowSpec(...) AS `rn`apache#117], ...)
and correspond physical plan is:

+--PhysicalWindow[6572]@16 ( windowFrameGroup=(Funcs=[avg(sum_sales#115) WindowSpec(...) AS `avg_monthly_sales`apache#116], ... )
    +--PhysicalWindow[6568]@29 ( windowFrameGroup=(Funcs=[rank() WindowSpec(...) AS `rn`apache#117], ...] )
If the final plan is generated as following:

MultiCastDataSinks
STREAM DATA SINK
  EXCHANGE ID: 20
  HASH_PARTITIONED: rn[apache#208], i_brand[apache#202], cc_name[apache#203], i_category[apache#201]
Before we eventually resolve the multi-window issue, we add a projection as following and force a mapping but this will not cover all potential problems.

MultiCastDataSinks
STREAM DATA SINK
  EXCHANGE ID: 20
  HASH_PARTITIONED: rn[apache#219], i_brand[apache#213], cc_name[apache#214], i_category[apache#212]
  PROJECTIONS: i_category[apache#184], i_brand[apache#185], cc_name[apache#186], d_year[apache#187], d_moy[apache#188], sum_sales[apache#189], avg_monthly_sales[apache#191], rn[apache#190]
  PROJECTION TUPLE: 20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants