Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[TubeMQ] Optimize the implementation of KeepAlive Interface #3108

Closed
2 tasks done
Tracked by #2282
gosonzhang opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3123
Closed
2 tasks done
Tracked by #2282

[TubeMQ] Optimize the implementation of KeepAlive Interface #3108

gosonzhang opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3123
Assignees
@gosonzhang
Labels
component/tubemq type/improve
Milestone
1.1.0

Comments

@gosonzhang
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The parent issue is:#2282

The current implementation part of KeepAlive is fine when there is only BDB, but it needs to be adjusted after adding ZooKeeper, the HA scheme based on BDB will be different from the HA scheme based on ZooKeeper. So we need to rewrite this part.

InLong Component

InLong TubeMQ

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes, I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gosonzhang gosonzhang

Labels
component/tubemq type/improve
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.1.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[INLONG-3108][TubeMQ] Optimize the implementation of KeepAlive Interface
1 participant
@gosonzhang