Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug][Agent] The kafka-clients with 3.0.0 does not package to the jar #4283

Closed
2 tasks done
Greedyu opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4286
Closed
2 tasks done

[Bug][Agent] The kafka-clients with 3.0.0 does not package to the jar #4283

Greedyu opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4286
Assignees
Labels
component/agent type/bug Something is wrong
Milestone

Comments

@Greedyu
Copy link
Contributor

Greedyu commented May 20, 2022

What happened

Unit test TestBinlogReader.binlogStartSpacialTest() method. The debezium-embedded package calls kafka client 2.4.1, but the Utils.isBlank method is connect-runtime 3.0.0. It is an online bug, so I changed the agent to the dependent jar package of kafka-clients:3.0.0
But compilation does not exist kafka-clients:3.0.0 depends on the jar package
wecom-temp-06eead7ef4f60668a064008037dfe898

What you expected to happen

Generate kafka-clients-3.0.0.jar package

How to reproduce

Unit test TestBinlogReader.binlogStartSpacialTest() method.

Environment

macOS

InLong version

master

InLong Component

InLong Agent

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes, I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@Greedyu Greedyu added the type/bug Something is wrong label May 20, 2022
@healchow healchow changed the title [Bug][Agent]Compilation does not exist kafka-clients:3.0.0 depends on the jar package [Bug][Agent] The kafka-clients with 3.0.0 does not package to the jar May 20, 2022
@healchow healchow added this to the 1.2.0 milestone May 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/agent type/bug Something is wrong
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants