-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
NNVM memory optimization example does not work #6272
Comments
I think this example is out of date, currently MXNet always enable inplace_update, and the macro for shared_memory is updated as @mli we should either remove outdated examples, or keep it up to date by testing it regularly |
This issue is closed due to lack of activity in the last 90 days. Feel free to reopen if this is still an active issue. Thanks! |
The issue still persists. Closing the issue on github does not fix the bug. |
@MarvinTeichmann ok it reopen, |
@apache/mxnet-committers: This issue has been inactive for the past 90 days. It has no label and needs triage. For general "how-to" questions, our user forum (and Chinese version) is a good place to get help. |
@MarvinTeichmann is this still an issue? If so, can you update your reproducibility instructions to 1.3 and we'll try and debug if the issue still persists. Thanks! |
@samskalicky the example hasn't been updated so the instruction remains the same. |
@MarvinTeichmann your issue has been fixed by this #13235 (comment) can you close it? |
Thanks. |
Steps to reproduce
Run the memcost example provided here.
make with_inplace
,make with_sharing
andmake with_both
all three use the same amount of MemoryTotal 1784 MB allocated
.make no_optimization
runs indefinitelyEnvironment info
MXNet versions tested:
Operating System: Linux
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: