-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
32 to 64 bit toolchain for windows-gpu build #17916
Conversation
Hey @ChaiBapchya , Thanks for submitting the PR
CI supported jobs: [miscellaneous, website, centos-cpu, windows-cpu, unix-gpu, centos-gpu, clang, sanity, windows-gpu, unix-cpu, edge] Note: |
@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-cpu] |
@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-gpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-gpu] |
@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu, windows-gpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-gpu, windows-cpu] |
@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu, windows-gpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-gpu, windows-cpu] |
@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu, windows-gpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-cpu, windows-gpu] |
@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu, windows-gpu] |
Unauthorized access detected. |
@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu, windows-gpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-cpu, windows-gpu] |
It seems like you are using the CI to develop a solution instead of verifying it. Would it make more sense to spin up a VM and develop the changes in there? Our setup is made so it so it can be reproduced on a VM, so I'd rather recommend that than trial and error in CI - especially considering the cost focus of your team at the moment. |
Yes. We're testing on VM and making changes @vexilligera can confirm. It passes on Windows VM but fails on the CI for some reason (for eg x86_64 bat file change to x64). So had to push it here and check on CI to verify if it is working or not. Agreed its an abuse of CI to check it but because of above mentioned reason I did that. |
Switching the toolchain from 32bit to 64bit alone doesnt fix the windows-gpu build issue. |
Changes
Switch from 32 to 64bit toolchain
Trying out @snnn suggestion :
[ONNX export] Fixing spatial export for batchnorm #17711 (comment)
Update dmlc-core to include the latest master (fix VS 2019 in dmlc)
Switch from 2015 to 2019 VS