Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[hotfix] backward compatibility on date expressions #3396

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2017

Conversation

mistercrunch
Copy link
Member

Previously all 'since' date expression evaluated in the future like
30 days would be reassigned to the past (now - 30 days). It would
extend to fixed dates which is a bad thing and was removed.

Now we have reports and dashboards in the wild that use things like 30 days and we'd like to not break those as we roll out the next version.

This fix should allow for that.

Previously all 'since' date expression evaluated in the future like
`30 days` would be reassigned to the past (now - `30 days`). It would
extend to fixed dates which is a bad thing and was removed.

Now we have reports and dashboards in the wild that use things like `30
days` and we'd like to not break those as we roll out the next version.

This fix should allow for that.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 30, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 68.682% when pulling 232d633 on mistercrunch:fix_dates into 9676f02 on apache:master.

@mistercrunch
Copy link
Member Author

hotfix, mergin'

@mistercrunch mistercrunch merged commit 1fd08a5 into apache:master Aug 30, 2017
@mistercrunch mistercrunch deleted the fix_dates branch August 30, 2017 18:18
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.20.0 labels Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.20.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants