Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TUBEMQ-300] Update LICENSE [addendum] #231

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 14, 2020
Merged

[TUBEMQ-300] Update LICENSE [addendum] #231

merged 2 commits into from Sep 14, 2020

Conversation

gosonzhang
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #231 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master    #231      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage      7.89%   7.88%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity      458     456       -2     
===========================================
  Files           242     242              
  Lines         26862   26862              
  Branches       4461    4461              
===========================================
- Hits           2122    2119       -3     
- Misses        24277   24279       +2     
- Partials        463     464       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../apache/tubemq/corebase/policies/FlowCtrlItem.java 38.88% <0.00%> (-1.12%) 8.00% <0.00%> (-1.00%)
.../tubemq/corebase/policies/FlowCtrlRuleHandler.java 43.98% <0.00%> (-0.59%) 34.00% <0.00%> (-1.00%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6a5ca49...1e69966. Read the comment docs.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 5, 2020

Why not apache license?

MIT license?

@gosonzhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

The TubeMQ LICENSE is not changed, still Apache V2. This is the description of the external code LICENSE referenced by the project, include:

  1. the reference's source code,
  2. come from where,
  3. what is the category and content of the LICENSE

So, @netroby, you see the MIT's statement

@guangxuCheng
Copy link
Member

@justinmclean can you take a look? We are preparing to release the next version. Thanks

Copy link
Member

@guangxuCheng guangxuCheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@guangxuCheng
Copy link
Member

Preparing to release the next version, Merge firstly.

@guangxuCheng guangxuCheng merged commit e7b636a into apache:master Sep 14, 2020
xuehuanran pushed a commit to xuehuanran/inlong that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants