Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TUBEMQ-374]Adjust some coding style issues #286

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2020
Merged

[TUBEMQ-374]Adjust some coding style issues #286

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2020

Conversation

gosonzhang
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #286 into master will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master    #286      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage      8.02%   7.99%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity      466     465       -1     
===========================================
  Files           245     245              
  Lines         27132   27132              
  Branches       4492    4492              
===========================================
- Hits           2176    2168       -8     
- Misses        24485   24491       +6     
- Partials        471     473       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../java/org/apache/flume/sink/tubemq/TubemqSink.java 51.42% <0.00%> (-4.00%) 14.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
.../producer/qltystats/DefaultBrokerRcvQltyStats.java 45.31% <0.00%> (-0.40%) 20.00% <0.00%> (-1.00%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c208153...d0e1f5d. Read the comment docs.

@gosonzhang gosonzhang merged commit 13ac803 into apache:master Oct 14, 2020
@gosonzhang gosonzhang deleted the TUBEMQ-374 branch October 14, 2020 11:29
xuehuanran pushed a commit to xuehuanran/inlong that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants