Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add r4 instance types for AWS #997

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 1, 2017
Merged

Add r4 instance types for AWS #997

merged 4 commits into from Apr 1, 2017

Conversation

jdeppe-pivotal
Copy link
Contributor

@jdeppe-pivotal jdeppe-pivotal commented Mar 2, 2017

Changes: Add r4 instance types for AWS

Description

Added the following AWS types:

  • r4.large
  • r4.xlarge
  • r4.2xlarge
  • r4.4xlarge
  • r4.8xlarge
  • r4.16xlarge

Also updated pricing information.

Status

  • done, ready for review

Checklist (tick everything that applies)

  • Code linting (required, can be done after the PR checks)
  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • ICLA (required for bigger changes)

@@ -101,12 +110,15 @@
REGION_NAME_MAP = {
'us-east': 'ec2_us_east',
'us-east-1': 'ec2_us_east',
'us-east-2': 'ec2_us_east',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe the value should match up to the api_name attribute of the region. Therefore, should this be ec2_us_east_ohio instead?

'us-west': 'ec2_us_west',
'us-west-1': 'ec2_us_west',
'us-west-2': 'ec2_us_west_oregon',
'eu-west-1': 'ec2_eu_west',
'eu-west-2': 'ec2_eu_west',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I'm not mistaken, this region is yet to be defined in the driver. That being said, it's worth having but the value should probably be different from the one mapped to by eu-west-1. How ec2_eu_west_2 instead?

@tonybaloney
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the contribution @jdeppe-pivotal there is a small merge conflict to resolve first. please rebase and push a merge commit

@tonybaloney
Copy link
Contributor

the build error is on trunk. changes are good to merge 👍

@asfgit asfgit merged commit 5c76d0e into apache:trunk Apr 1, 2017
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2017
Closes #997
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants