New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for failsafe? #86
Comments
Why do you think they do not run? There is #21 but tests not running at all would be new to me. |
Looking at our build output, there's a few strange things:
|
An integration test reproducing the issue would be awesome. |
I'll prepare a reproducer this week. |
Is this from surefire? Are you using Junit5 parameterized tests? |
@famod this is for failsafe. We are not using parameterized tests. I am going to provide the reproducer soon. Today I have some time to focus on this item. |
Steps to reproduce:
Note: it's ok if the integration tests fail when running w/ mvnd. In fact, this is what I want to investigate (whether we can make them work in this scenario or not). Edit: removed the unnecessary "install¨ target because, as explained below, it repeats several parts of the build cycle. |
Hi,
Is there a reason why you use I would suggest to use only |
Thanks for the explanation about repeating the cycles! I wasn't aware about it. Using the
So, I tried with just "clean verify" but it didn't seem to have affected the behavior. The tests still did not execute. I am wondering if we have something on our pom that would cause it to skip under these circumstances. |
Now I realized you pass |
That was right on point. Using the master does make our tests run! Thanks Peter, I'll make sure to upgrade once the new version is out. |
OK, let's close this as a duplicate of #157. |
I noticed that our integration tests do not run when using mvnd.
Not knowing anything Maven internals and the challenges of running these in parallel, I am not sure if:
Could you, please, share some insights? Should the integration test execution, managed by the failsafe plugin, be supported?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: