Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PulsarStandaloneBuilder: make it a public API #10473

Open
eolivelli opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

PulsarStandaloneBuilder: make it a public API #10473

eolivelli opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted type/enhancement The enhancements for the existing features or docs. e.g. reduce memory usage of the delayed messages

Comments

@eolivelli
Copy link
Contributor

PulsarStandaloneBuilder looks like a great API for users to launch an embedded Pulsar service for unit tests.

Currently (2.8.0) there are a few problems that need to be fixed:

  • Provide convenience methods to build a Pulsar Client and a Pulsar Admin
  • Provide a way to start the server without creating a real file on disk
  • Add tests that ensure that PulsarStandaloneBuilder can be called by a Java program, not only by the means of the scripts bundled with Pulsar
@eolivelli eolivelli added the type/enhancement The enhancements for the existing features or docs. e.g. reduce memory usage of the delayed messages label May 3, 2021
@codelipenghui
Copy link
Contributor

The issue had no activity for 30 days, mark with Stale label.

@MananJethwani
Copy link

@eolivelli is this issue still open, would like to contribute

@eolivelli
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think so.

I suggest you to try it and fix it in a way that you can start Pulsar in a JVM. The main goal is to use it to run unit tests of applications based on Pulsar that cannot use docker/testcontainers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted type/enhancement The enhancements for the existing features or docs. e.g. reduce memory usage of the delayed messages
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants