You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For an entity User, the endpoint will be users, but there is two issues:
the plural name of an entity is not configurable, ex the plural of Medium should be Media and not Mediums (well technically speaking both are valid but the meaning differs so it depends of the context)
composed name like ContentCluster have either content_cluster or contentcluster as an endpoint, on may prefer another one like content-cluster. I'm saying either because I have both cases although I'm not really sure where it comes from but it's not the point.
Could it be possible to make this configurable? For the composed name maybe a global naming strategy would do although a configuration on a resource basis may be useful too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Technically it is already configurable using custom operations and custom routes. That being said, it's not developer friendly and any work on that is welcome!
For an entity
User
, the endpoint will beusers
, but there is two issues:Medium
should beMedia
and notMediums
(well technically speaking both are valid but the meaning differs so it depends of the context)ContentCluster
have eithercontent_cluster
orcontentcluster
as an endpoint, on may prefer another one likecontent-cluster
. I'm saying either because I have both cases although I'm not really sure where it comes from but it's not the point.Could it be possible to make this configurable? For the composed name maybe a global naming strategy would do although a configuration on a resource basis may be useful too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: