Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

APIs.json 0.17 Proposal #79

Open
kinlane opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

APIs.json 0.17 Proposal #79

kinlane opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kinlane
Copy link
Contributor

kinlane commented Feb 23, 2024

I have posted a draft proposal for APIs.json 0.17 based upon the work we've been doing with APIs.io.

This release is primarily about adding:

  • aid - A unique identifier at the collection and api levels.
  • overlays - References to collection and api level overlays.

After that, I'd like to introduce a handful of property types:

  • GettingStarted
  • DeprecationPolicy
  • GraphQLSchema
  • Integrations
  • PostmanWorkspace
  • ServiceLevelAgreement
  • Versioning
  • Webhooks

These property types were identified profiling 75 APIs published to APIs.io.

You can see the latest version in use in the APIs.json Artisanal project:

Please share your thoughts and comments below, and let's keep iterating on the spec towards 1.0.

@kinlane
Copy link
Contributor Author

kinlane commented Feb 23, 2024

I remember, I was going to add an OpenAI plugin manifest -- will update it! #78

@kinlane
Copy link
Contributor Author

kinlane commented Feb 26, 2024

Adding from common by Robert Buchanan on LinkedIn - we should make aid a URN - https://www.issn.org/services/online-services/urn/

@ChristophWeber
Copy link

aid could also be DSN, Data Source Name, which in practice is quite similar to a URN when referencing internet resources. However, a DSN does not have the requirement to register a namespace with IANA or ISSN which I think no API owner will bother to do.

@kinlane
Copy link
Contributor Author

kinlane commented Mar 7, 2024

Nice. Thank you @ChristophWeber -- adding into the mix to consider, and I think this gets closer than a URN.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants