Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Namespaced persistence #41

Closed
2 of 5 tasks
rivertam opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed
2 of 5 tasks

Namespaced persistence #41

rivertam opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
docs Focuses on documentation changes feature New addition or enhancement to existing solutions

Comments

@rivertam
Copy link

rivertam commented Mar 21, 2018

  • has-reproduction
  • feature
  • docs
  • blocking
  • good first issue

Hi! ^ Hope I did that right. I'm using web, so I'll use web terminology/concepts and hope it translates.

I'm considering using this to persist some data. However, I'd like to keep separate caches to keep the data separate. I'm not sure if this is a great architectural idea overall, but it's striking me as clean at the moment. I also might want to keep stuff in local storage that isn't from apollo cache. In order to persist it, I think the library will need to basically namespace it as separate keys in storage. Is this library capable of doing such a thing? And, if so, how?

Thanks!

@ghost ghost added docs Focuses on documentation changes feature New addition or enhancement to existing solutions labels Mar 21, 2018
@rivertam
Copy link
Author

Oh, I didn't read clearly enough. I think key should work for my needs. Will reopen if it turns into an issue. Sorry for creating an unnecessary issue!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Focuses on documentation changes feature New addition or enhancement to existing solutions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant