Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TIMOB-13162] Functions assigned to proxy property may be garbage collected #3994

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 17, 2013

Conversation

Kikimora
Copy link

See problem details in the corresponding JIRA issue.

@negupta
Copy link
Contributor

negupta commented Apr 19, 2013

I did not find a signed CLA in place. Did you sign one?

@Kikimora
Copy link
Author

Hi, I've just signed CLA.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Neeraj Gupta notifications@github.comwrote:

I did not find a signed CLA in place. Did you sign one?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/3994#issuecomment-16670274
.

@negupta
Copy link
Contributor

negupta commented Apr 25, 2013

Signed CLA is in place.

@WhichKatieDid
Copy link
Contributor

The problem with this is that a JSProtect without a JSUnprotect will cause memory leaks.

@Kikimora
Copy link
Author

Kikimora commented Jun 5, 2013

KrollWrapper objects unprotects js object on deallocation. I think everything should be all right.

@WhichKatieDid
Copy link
Contributor

Fair enough. CR approved.

@srahim
Copy link
Contributor

srahim commented Jul 17, 2013

Functionally Tested and APPROVED

srahim added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2013
[TIMOB-13162] Functions assigned to proxy property may be garbage collected
@srahim srahim merged commit c932650 into tidev:master Jul 17, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants