Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TIMOB-13419][TIMOB-13421] iOS ListView #4424

Merged
merged 14 commits into from Jul 1, 2013
Merged

[TIMOB-13419][TIMOB-13421] iOS ListView #4424

merged 14 commits into from Jul 1, 2013

Conversation

vishalduggal
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes
TIMOB-13419
TIMOB-13421

Use KS PR 106 to test

@ghost ghost assigned srahim Jun 27, 2013
-(void)configureFooter
{
if (_footerViewProxy == nil) {
_footerViewProxy = [[TiViewProxy alloc] init];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Surely this and the headerView, searchWrapper, etc, can use a factory method for a lot of this. (view proxy alloc init, set layout properties.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixing

@@ -390,6 +551,20 @@ -(void)setPullView_:(id)args

}

-(void)setKeepSectionsInSearch_:(id)args
{
[self.proxy replaceValue:args forKey:@"keepSectionsInSearch" notification:NO];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the proxy do this automatically, with the last action being to call setKeepSectionsInSearch_? In other words, is this line redundant?

-(void)setCaseInsensitiveSearch_:(id)args
{
caseInsensitiveSearch = [TiUtils boolValue:args def:YES];
[self.proxy replaceValue:NUMBOOL(caseInsensitiveSearch) forKey:@"caseInsensitiveSearch" notification:NO];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't this be removed too ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixing

@srahim
Copy link
Contributor

srahim commented Jun 28, 2013

Looks good to me.

Code Reviewed and APPROVED

@srahim
Copy link
Contributor

srahim commented Jul 1, 2013

Functionally Tested and APPROVED

srahim added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2013
[TIMOB-13419][TIMOB-13421] iOS ListView
@srahim srahim merged commit 2bfbcf5 into tidev:master Jul 1, 2013
@vishalduggal vishalduggal deleted the timob-13419 branch October 27, 2014 19:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants